A slander of title will generally occur where one maliciously seeks to disparage another's interest to property, to make it unmerchantable, by recording an instru- ment whereby the maligner purports to have some interest in the property.
On the other hand, slander occurs when someone talks about a person or business in a negative way, which may cause damage to their reputation.
The plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the harmful statements are false. By examining whether the defendant's statement would have an effect different from a proposed statement by the plaintiff, courts test whether a statement is false.
To slander is making a false statement about another person or people verbally with the intent to defame the subject of the statements. Slander is a legal term used to describe defamation, or harming the reputation of a person or a business by telling one or more others something both untrue and damaging about them.
The Act abolishes the distinction between libel and slander and the action for defamation may be brought without proof of special damage. There are three traditional elements to the cause of action that the plaintiff must establish, namely publication, identification and defamatory meaning.
Elements of Defamation The defendant made the defamatory statement to a third party knowing it was false (or they should have known it was false); The defamatory statement was disseminated through a publication or communication; and. The plaintiff's reputation suffered damage or harm.
Slander per se is the spoken word version of libel per se—a false statement that is so obviously harmful that damage to a plaintiff's reputation is presumed. Examples of slander per se include false accusations of improper sexual conduct, criminal activity, or bad business dealings.
Identification. The statement not only contains falsehoods but specifically “identifies” a person or organization. It needs to be shown that it is “of and concerning” the person in question. However, if the subject's identity has been either altered or omitted in the statement, that person may not have a libel claim.
Based on this definition, this Court has held that four elements constitute the crime of libel, namely (a) defamatory imputation tending to cause dishonor, discredit or contempt; (b) malice, either in law or in fact; (c) publication; and (d) identifiability of the person defamed.
The Five Elements of Defamation Explained The Information was Made Public. The Defaming Statement Names the Person. The Defamatory Statement Had a Negative Impact on the Victim's Reputation. The Published Remarks are Demonstrably False. The Defendant In the Case Is At Fault for the Defamation.