Some famous examples of social media defamation cases include Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Courtney Love, and James Woods. They have all been involved with numerous libel lawsuits over tweets, with mixed results. To be considered a defamation case, social media content needs to possess three elements: Falsity.
Social media defamation can take many forms, such as: Falsely accusing someone of a crime. Making untrue claims about a person's professional reputation. Spreading misinformation about an individual's personal life. Sharing altered photos or videos to portray someone negatively.
Employers cannot legally prevent employees from discussing their jobs, complaining about colleagues, or disparaging company decisions and policies on social media. Restrictions against employees' abilities to connect with (or “friend”) one another on personal social media pages.
Negative statements about people or companies appear frequently on social media sites, such as Twitter and Facebook. If they are false statements of fact, they can be considered defamation in some circumstances, or more specifically libel because they are written statements.
If you post content on a social media page you administrate, and allow comments or third-party party posts, and those posts are defamatory, you might be held liable as the “publishers” of those defamatory comments or posts.
Signs, gestures, photographs, pictures can also give rise to a claim in defamation. The difference between claims for libel and claims for slander is what a claimant must prove to succeed.
The best way for you to avoid any legal trouble for photoshopping an image is to get consent from the photographer. Note that you need to get the consent of the photographer, not the person depicted in the photo. This is because under copyright law, the creator of the work owns the copyright.
If another business uses it without your permission, that is copyright infringement. On the other hand, if a third party or agency photographs you, you may not own the copyright in the image. However, this does not mean that you do not have any rights.
Although the photographer does own the copyright for the photographs, they cannot use the photographs publicly without your permission if the photographs have been commissioned for private or domestic purposes (such as a family photo shoot or a wedding.)