Therefore in order to sue, one will have to prove that the statement/ animated picture is false and defamatory (ruined reputation by lowering the institution in the estimation of reasonable, ordinary persons generally or degrades the standing of the institution in the ordinary members of the general public, that the ...
To put it simply: yes, if it is defamatory in nature, you could land up in court facing a lawsuit. Defamation can be seen as any wrongful, intentional publication of words or behaviour relating to another person that injures or demeans their status, good name, character or reputation.
The elements necessary to establish defamation at the workplace include: A false, defamatory statement about an employee. The unauthorized publication or communication of such statement to a third party. Fault on part of the individual who made the statement, either intentional or at least negligent.
Abstract. ing to some South African delict scholars, the South African law of defamation makes the wrong fulness of a defamatory statement turn on two conditions: first, that the statement caused reputational damage; and, secondly, that the damage caused was not outweighed by the achievement of some greater good.
To establish a defamation case in South Africa, the following elements must be present: Publication: The false statement must be communicated to a third party, which means it has been made known to someone other than the person making the statement and the subject of the statement.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
Generally, to prove defamation, you must show that a false statement was made, about you, to third parties, and which caused you damage. Once you have evaluated your case, and determined that you can satisfy these elements, you can then proceed with pursuing your matter.