Intentional torts are the most serious. They are deliberate acts intended to injure others; or to interfere with another person's rights. A common one is battery. This can involve violence with the intent to injure.
Which of the following is an example of an abnormally dangerous condition or activity? Storing explosive devices is an example of an abnormally dangerous condition or activity.
Four of them are personal: assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment. The other three are trespass to chattels, trespass to property, and conversion.
In tort law, an abnormally dangerous activity is an activity that is "not common usage" and creates a foreseeable and very significant risk of physical harm, even when reasonable care is exercised by all parties.
“Abnormally dangerous” or “ultrahazardous” activities are those that can't be performed or maintained safely even if done so with reasonable care, and therefore the actor may face strict liability for any harm caused. Restatement (3d) of Torts: Physical and Emotional Harm, § 20, Comment B.
Dynamite blasting in a populated area - This is a classic example of an inherently dangerous activity. The use of explosives in a populated area presents a significant risk of harm, regardless of how careful the operators are.
Dangerous Thing– As per the rules laid down, the liability of escape of a thing from an individual's land will arise only when the thing which is collected is a dangerous thing that is a thing which likely causes damage or injury to other people in person or their property on its escape.
In tort law, an abnormally dangerous activity is an activity that is "not common usage" and creates a foreseeable and very significant risk of physical harm, even when reasonable care is exercised by all parties.
In tort law, an abnormally dangerous activity is an activity that is "not common usage" and creates a foreseeable and very significant risk of physical harm, even when reasonable care is exercised by all parties.
§ 519: General Principle. (1) One who carries on an abnormally dangerous activity is subject to liability for harm to the person, land or chattels of another resulting from the activity, although he has exercised the utmost care to prevent the harm.