In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Restrictive Covenants In A Debt Contract In San Antonio
Category:
State:
Multi-State
City:
San Antonio
Control #:
US-00404BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Restrictive covenants are commonly used to prevent a bond issuer from issuing more debt until one (or more) series of bonds mature. The issuer may also be restricted from paying dividends above a certain amount to shareholders.
Restrictive Covenants, Explained This restricts how homeowners can manage and modify their land. Examples include restrictions on fence options, the type of animals allowed and the use of outbuildings, such as sheds.
The association or another representative may enforce restrictive covenants by civil litigation or administrative proceedings. This section gives justice courts jurisdiction in cases relating to the enforcement of a deed restriction of a residential subdivision that does not concern a structural change to a dwelling.
The three types of covenants are positive, negative, and financial. Each contains a unique set of requirements and stipulations. Positive and negative covenants are not interchangeable as good or bad but rather refer to what borrowers can or cannot do.
One of the most common restrictive covenants is not to do or keep anything on the property that could be a nuisance to the neighbouring properties. This is general covenant that could cover a wide variety of actions, to try to keep the area a pleasant place to live.
Statute of Limitations. Please keep in mind that there is a 4-year statute of limitations in Texas for enforcing the breach of a restrictive covenant. Thus, it is imperative that associations enforce deed restrictions in a diligent and timely manner or they may lose their right to enforce them.
Because there's no central authority to keep everyone in line, it's up to individual property owners to take matters into their own hands. They can either enforce the restrictions themselves or turn to local authorities.
A property owners' association or another “representative designated by an owner” may file a lawsuit to enforce a restrictive covenant.
The absence of an HOA board can result in significant risks, including financial mismanagement, where bills go unpaid and dues are uncollected, leading to financial instability. Residents and city officials can also bring about legal actions against the HOA, resulting in expensive court actions.
The new law went into effect on Jan. 1, 2024. HOAs are mandated by law to provide property owners with a catalog outlining prohibited items, a fine timetable, and details on the conduct of hearings. The information must be posted to their website and given annually to residents via delivery, first-class mail, or email.