In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Restrictive Covenants In Shareholders Agreements In North Carolina
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
North Carolina's “blue-pencil” rule This rule allows the court to strike out a distinctly separable part of the covenant in order to render the non-compete agreement reasonable. The court, though, may not otherwise revise or rewrite the covenant.
What happens if someone breaches a North Carolina non-disclosure agreement? If a party breaches the NDA without written approval, the other party can seek legal remedies, such as injunctive actions or damages as per North Carolina state laws.
Non-compete agreements are not viewed favorably under North Carolina law. To be valid, they must be designed to protect a legitimate business interest of the employer. If it is too broad to be considered a reasonable protection of the employer's business, it will not be enforced.
NDA enforceability Factors such as the specificity of the information being protected, the duration of the agreement, and the legitimate business interests involved all impact the enforceability of NDAs in North Carolina.
2. NDAs are enforceable when they are signed — if they are properly drafted and executed.
In North Carolina, non-compete agreements are enforceable, but only under strict conditions. A valid non-compete must meet certain criteria, including being in writing, having a reasonable time and territory restriction, and being part of your employment contract.
In North Carolina, there's a noteworthy aspect of restrictive covenants to consider; most covenants automatically expire after 30 years unless they are specifically for residential purposes only. This statutory limitation is a safeguard against outdated or unreasonable restrictions binding properties in perpetuity.
How are NDAs enforced internationally? NDAs can be enforced internationally depending on the jurisdiction and the laws that will apply to the NDA.