In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Agreements For Restrictive Covenant In King
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
King
Control #:
US-00404BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
More info
The latest lesson on restrictive covenants from New York's highest court is clear: they must be presented to employees in a non-coercive fashion. Take the document and your government-issued ID to a licensed notary and sign in the presence of the notary (there may be a fee to do so).A restrictive covenant is typically a clause in a contract which prohibits an employee from competing with their exemployer for a certain period. Drafting Clear and Reasonable Agreements: Courts will not enforce ambiguous or overly broad restrictive covenants. Multiple states have imposed more onerous restrictions (if not outright bans) on employers' use of restrictive covenant agreements. The most common example of a restrictive covenant is a non-compete agreement which restricts a former employee's future employment opportunities. "Funding Agreement" has the meaning provided in the Recitals hereof. "Governmental Authority" means the Federal Government, the State of New. Non-compete agreements, also referred to as Restrictive Covenants, are often contained within employment contracts. These agreements may also be called a "covenant not to compete" or a "restrictive covenant.