Several factors can void or limit the enforceability of a non-compete agreement, including overly broad restrictions, unreasonable time frames or geographical limits, lack of consideration (such as compensation or job opportunities provided in exchange for the agreement), and violation of public policy.
It is generally unlawful in California for an employer's severance agreement to state that you may not compete against the employer in a future job.
The agreement must be backed by consideration. The employer must give something of value to the employee in exchange for the agreement. Employees must have 21 days to consider the severance offer, or 45 days if more than one employee is laid off as part of a group lay off.
These agreements don't even have to be signed to be deemed problematic, the board noted: If the firm merely presents employees with agreements that contain broad language requiring confidentiality or nondisparagement, it is engaging in an unfair labor practice.
Non-compete agreements are illegal in California, but some companies still include them in severance packages. If you see one, ask for it to be removed.
Fraud, misrepresentation, duress, or unconscionability are common defenses you can use if you want to void a severance agreement that you already signed.
Non-competes are generally binding. So they are enforceable when an employee leaves the company. It doesn't matter if you're fired or resign. Valid agreements must be reasonable in scope.