When you include an escalation clause in your offer, you're telling the seller your highest possible offer right out of the gate. This can limit your negotiating power. Additionally, some sellers won't accept offers that include escalation clauses. So you may be limited in the homes you can make these types of bids on.
(1) It is declared that the public policy of this state prohibits the inclusion or enforcement of escalation clauses in land leases or other leases or agreements for recreational facilities, land, or other commonly used facilities serving residential iniums, and such clauses are hereby declared void for public ...
To add, yes, escalation clauses are highly advisable. I use them for almost every single house my buyer is going to write an offer on and we know for certain there will be other offers. The escalation clause in itself is very favorable to buyers and protects them in more ways than one.
If you made an offer of $350,000 with an escalation clause stating you would increase your bid by $5,000 in response to a higher offer, then your bid would become $365,000. You might save $10,000 in this case.
Bidding higher is the best way to beat an existing offer with an escalation clause. In most cases, the seller's agent won't and can't reveal the highest offer in an escalation clause, so you may have to guess.
The use of escalation clauses may also lengthen the negotiation process, a potential disadvantage to sellers and buyers. The buyer who is unsuccessful in a negotiation where a competing buyer used an escalation clause may feel that they were treated unfairly.
However, buyers need to be careful with these clauses as they can sometimes backfire. “An escalation clause needs to be in conjunction with a really good offer,” said Madani of Room Real Estate. “It's really the whole package to get your offer accepted.”
Generally, buyers can be refunded without issue when the seller backs out. Buyers can also cancel their offer, but disputes are most common in these cases.