Federal Arbitration Act Grounds For Vacating Award In Philadelphia

State:
Multi-State
County:
Philadelphia
Control #:
US-0011BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The Arbitration Case Submission Form serves as a crucial document in the context of binding arbitration, particularly relevant under the Federal Arbitration Act grounds for vacating an award in Philadelphia. This form facilitates the initiation of arbitration by outlining the necessary information about the parties involved, including their names and contact details, as well as specific case details such as type and consent to arbitration. Key features include sections for identifying the arbitrator and detailing any financial agreements concerning arbitration expenses. Attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants can utilize this form in various scenarios, such as personal injury disputes, business conflicts, or contract issues, providing a structured approach to resolving disputes outside traditional litigation. The form emphasizes clarity and ease of use, ensuring all parties involved understand their roles and obligations. When filling out the form, it is essential to include accurate information and ensure all parties have agreed to the arbitration process, as this can impact the enforceability of the arbitration award. Overall, the form supports a professional and efficient arbitration process that aligns with Federal guidelines.
Free preview
  • Preview Arbitration Case Submission Form
  • Preview Arbitration Case Submission Form

Form popularity

FAQ

A court may vacate an award only if it finds that one of the limited grounds in the FAA (9 USC section 10) applies, namely: the award is a result of corruption or fraud; there was evident partiality or corruption by an arbitrator; there was arbitrator misconduct; or.

A court may vacate an award only if it finds that one of the limited grounds in the FAA (9 USC section 10) applies, namely: the award is a result of corruption or fraud; there was evident partiality or corruption by an arbitrator; there was arbitrator misconduct; or.

The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) broadly requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements but exempts from its application arbitration “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” 9 U.S.C. § 1.

Section 144 deals with the rescission of arbitration awards and rulings. Any award may be varied or rescinded by the commissioner who issued the award or by any other commissioner appointed by the Director to do so. A party must apply for rescission.

An arbitrator may be disqualified on the grounds that the arbitrator was ineligible for appointment to the Tribunal under Additional Facility Arbitration Rule 21(2)(a)-(c), or on account of existing circumstances that give rise to justifiable doubts as to the qualities of the arbitrator required by Additional Facility ...

To vacate an award, the arbitrators must have known of a governing legal principle yet refused to apply it or ignored it, and the law ignored by the arbitrators must be clearly defined.

The merits of the dispute are not considered and the award can only be vacated where: (1) the award was procured by fraud or corruption; (2) there was corruption in the arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator committed misconduct resulting in substantial prejudice; (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers; (5) the arbitrator ...

(1) Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside such award in ance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3). (ii) the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India. (iii) it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.

A court may vacate an award only if it finds that one of the limited grounds in the FAA (9 USC section 10) applies, namely: the award is a result of corruption or fraud; there was evident partiality or corruption by an arbitrator; there was arbitrator misconduct; or.

To vacate an award, the arbitrators must have known of a governing legal principle yet refused to apply it or ignored it, and the law ignored by the arbitrators must be clearly defined.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Federal Arbitration Act Grounds For Vacating Award In Philadelphia