The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 200 et seq., provides that two (or more) parties can agree to resolve any future differences through “mandatory arbitration,” i.e., a dispute resolution process held outside of the courts.
Because the United States is a federal system, arbitration legislation exists at both the federal and state level. The primary federal statute governing arbitration is the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”).
What is the California Arbitration Act? The California Arbitration Act governs how arbitration is completed in California and when and how a dispute must be submitted to arbitration.
The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts a California law (AB 51) that prohibits employers from requiring employees or job applicants to agree to resolve certain disputes in binding arbitration instead of in court.
Under CCP § 583.310, an action must be brought to trial within five years after it is commenced against the defendant. An action “commences” on the date the original complaint is filed with the court against the defendant. If other defendants are later added, those actions will have a different date of commencement.
When Does a Federal District Court Have Jurisdiction over an FAA Dispute? Enforcement of the FAA is not limited to federal courts. See Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49, 71 (2009) (“Under the FAA, state courts as well as federal courts are obliged to honor and enforce agreements to arbitrate.”).
The Federal Arbitration Act and Preemption The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article VI, clause 2) provides the basis for the doctrine of federal preemption, under which “state laws that interfere with, or are contrary to, federal law” are invalidated.
A petition to compel arbitration or to stay proceedings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1281.2 and 1281.4 must state, in addition to other required allegations, the provisions of the written agreement and the paragraph that provides for arbitration.
Arbitration is a procedure in which a dispute is submitted, by agreement of the parties, to one or more arbitrators who make a binding decision on the dispute. In choosing arbitration, the parties opt for a private dispute resolution procedure instead of going to court.
When Does a Federal District Court Have Jurisdiction over an FAA Dispute? Enforcement of the FAA is not limited to federal courts. See Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49, 71 (2009) (“Under the FAA, state courts as well as federal courts are obliged to honor and enforce agreements to arbitrate.”).