Injunction With Damages In Houston
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The basic remedy for breach of contract is an award of damages. it's by far and away, the most common legal remedy for breach of contract. Damages is the legal right substituted for performance, when the defaulting party fails to perform the contract, as referred to above.
Requirements for Granting an Injunction The key requirements include: Adequacy of Damages: You must show that monetary damages would not be an adequate remedy for the breach. In other words, there has to be some harm that cannot be simply fixed through financial compensation.
To be entitled to a temporary injunction, the applicant must plead a cause of action and show a probable right to recover on that cause of action and a probable, imminent, and irreparable injury in the interim. “Imminent” means that the injury is relatively certain to occur rather than being remote and speculative.
An injunction is a court order requiring a person to do or cease doing a specific action. There are three types of injunctions: Permanent injunctions , Temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions . Temporary restraining orders (TRO) and preliminary injunctions are equitable in nature.
Orders of specific performance are granted when damages are not an adequate remedy, and in some specific cases such as land sale. Such orders are discretionary, as with all equitable remedies, so the availability of this remedy will depend on whether it is appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
"Adequate Remedies" refers to the legal remedy, and equitable remedies that apply to the administrative or state court remedies. The court was unable to grant any equitable remedies such as specific performance where there is a plain legal remedy such as monetary damages.
The aim of a damages undertaking is to compensate any party that is harmed by an unfair injunction. For example, you could seek an injunction to stop a competing business from selling a certain product in Australia. That injunction is granted, but then overturned a year later when you lose the court case.
Adequacy of Damages This question is first considered from the Claimant's point of view. It is commonly found in business protection cases that damages will not be an adequate remedy. Firstly it is often impossible or extremely difficult to quantify loss in such cases.
(1) that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance of hardships between the parties, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (4) that the public interest would not be disserved by ...
To warrant preliminary injunctive relief, the moving party must show (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, (2) that it would suffer irrepa- rable injury if the injunction were not granted, (3) that an injunction would not substantially injure other interested parties, and (4) that the public interest ...
