This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
A plaintiff seeking temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance will therefore have to establish a strong prima-facie case on basis of undisputed facts. The conduct of the plaintiff will also be a very relevant consideration for purposes of injunction.
Injunctive Relief Is there a serious question to be tried? Will the party seeking the injunction suffer irreparable harm if the relief sought is not granted? Will granting the relief do more harm to the defendant than good for the plaintiff?
Applicants for an injunction being sought quia timet to prevent apprehended future harm must establish all three of the following elements: that there is a serious issue to be tried; that there is a high degree of probability that they will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted; and that the balance ...
These courts consider: (1) the likelihood of success on the merits; (2) irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted; (3) whether a balancing of the relevant equities favors the injunction; and (4) whether the issuance of the injunction is in the public interest.
The defendant named in a mandatory injunction must undo the wrong or injury that one has caused. Unless prevented by constitutional or statutory provision, a court may issue a mandatory injunction where the defendant's encroachment on the plaintiff's rights is immediate, intentional and repetitive.
To get an injunction or mandatory order, you generally must prove that there is a serious question to be tried, that you will suffer irreparable harm if you are not granted the relief, and that the balance of convenience favours granting the relief sought.
The test requires a demonstration of irreparable harm, a balance of convenience in favour of the party seeking relief, and a serious question to be tried. This test remains the guiding principle for granting injunctive relief in Ontario and has been applied in numerous cases over the years.
To obtain a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must establish “that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. Nat.
The party seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate that they will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted. Irreparable harm means that the harm cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages or any other remedy except an injunction.
(11) A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction bears the burden of presenting facts which show a reasonable probability that he will succeed on the merits.