Attorney Client Privilege With Consultants In Salt Lake

State:
Multi-State
County:
Salt Lake
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document serves as a formal complaint filed in the Circuit Court of Salt Lake County, addressing issues related to attorney-client privilege with consultants. Central to the case is the allegation that the defendants engaged in ex parte communications with the plaintiff's treating physicians and the plaintiff himself, violating the confidentiality of attorney-client interactions. This complaint highlights the significance of legal protections in maintaining the integrity of the attorney-client relationship, especially in cases involving workers' compensation and rehabilitation processes. Key features include the detailed outlining of the plaintiff's employment circumstances, the sequence of communications, and the alleged wrongful interference by the defendants. Filling and editing instructions emphasize the need to insert accurate details regarding the parties involved, dates, and specific claims. The form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants who require a structured means to articulate breaches of privilege in legal matters. The document provides a framework for seeking compensatory and punitive damages for violations of confidentiality and professional integrity.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship

Form popularity

FAQ

Crime or Fraud Exception. If a client seeks advice from an attorney to assist with the furtherance of a crime or fraud or the post-commission concealment of the crime or fraud, then the communication is not privileged.

The privilege extends to communications involving agents that facilitate the attorney-client relationship.

Since the client, and not the attorney, holds the privilege, the client holds the ultimate authority to assert it or waive it.

Attorney Client Privilege (Gold Standard/SUWA) -305(18) The attorney-client privilege protects information given by a client to an attorney that is “necessary to obtain informed legal advice—which might not have been made absent the privilege.

The attorney-client privilege applies to communications “to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the transmission of the information or the accomplishment of the purpose for which the lawyer is consulted.” Cal. Evid. Code § 952. This includes communications to an expert consultant.

The privilege extends only to communications that the client intends to be confidential. Communications made in non-private settings, or in the presence of third persons unnecessary to accomplish the purpose for which the attorney was consulted, are not confidential and therefore are not protected by the privilege.

The attorney-client privilege applies to communications “to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the transmission of the information or the accomplishment of the purpose for which the lawyer is consulted.” Cal. Evid. Code § 952. This includes communications to an expert consultant.

The attorney-client privilege does not apply to every communication with an attorney. For the privilege to exist, the communication must be to, from, or with an attorney, and intended to be confidential. In addition, the communication must be for the purpose of requesting or receiving legal advice.

Beware of forwarding email strings and sharing attorney-client privileged communications. As the client, you hold the privilege, but if you voluntarily disclose our communications (e.g., “Our General Counsel told us…”), the privilege is waived.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Attorney Client Privilege With Consultants In Salt Lake