In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Attorney Client Privilege With Board Of Directors In Fulton
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Fulton
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Who Should Not Serve On A Board Of Directors? Those Who Lack Objectivity. People Who Are All Talk And No Action. Those Who Are Conflict-Averse. People Who Don't Play Well With Others. Those Who Are Greedy. People Who Are Resistant To Change. People Who Are Not Team Players. People Who Don't Believe in the Mission.
For publicly listed companies in the U.S., members of the board of directors are elected by shareholders at the annual meeting. Board candidates can be nominated by the board's nominating committee or by investors seeking to change a board's membership and policies.
Lawyers with a broad skill-set should not be discounted as potential non-executive directors. There is room for lawyers in this role, but only those lawyers who have all the skills that the board is looking for.
Board minutes often contain information that is subject to the attorney-client privilege and that directors may prefer to keep confidential. However, most jurisdictions allow stockholders to inspect corporate books and records, including board minutes.
A lawyer serving as an outside director has the same duty of care as any other outside director, and the same exposure to liability. The lawyer's skill and knowledge must be brought into the boardroom in the interest of the corporation.
Crime or Fraud Exception. If a client seeks advice from an attorney to assist with the furtherance of a crime or fraud or the post-commission concealment of the crime or fraud, then the communication is not privileged.
There are two major exceptions to the lawyer-client privilege under the California Evidence Code, as discussed below. 2.1. Crime or fraud. 2.2. Preventing death or substantial physical harm.
One federal judge opined that “the privilege applies only if (1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to whom the communication was made (a) is a member of the bar of a court, or his subordinate and (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer; (3) ...
Contents Person who asserts privilege must be an actual client or must have attempted to become a client of the attorney at the time information was disclosed. Person to whom the communication was made must be a certified attorney. Communication must occur solely between the client and attorney.