In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Define Attorney-client Relationship In Law In Arizona
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Rule 1.8 - Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules (a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless: (1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest ...
Attorney-Client Privilege Under the Arizona Statutes Arizona Statute 13-4062 is one of the main laws protecting attorney-client privilege in Arizona. Under this statute, no attorney can be forced to testify in court about any communications between the attorney and their client made in the course of the representation.
“The purpose of the common interest doctrine is to permit persons with common interests to share privileged attorney-client and work-product communications in order to coordinate their respective positions without destroying the privilege,” such that “the doctrine protects only those communications made to facilitate ...
12-2234 - Attorney and client. A. In a civil action an attorney shall not, without the consent of his client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to him, or his advice given thereon in the course of professional employment.
An attorney-client relationship can be created by express or implied agreement. Except when created by court appointment, the attorney-client relationship may be found to exist based on the intent and conduct of the parties and the reasonable expectations of the potential client.
Rule 1.4 - Communication (a) A lawyer shall: (1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client's informed consent, as defined in ER 1.0(e), is required by these Rules; (2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be ...
ER 7.1, as amended in 2021, now permits lawyers to say that they "specialize" in a practice area if they actually have expertise or limit their practice to a certain area of law. Only lawyers who are certified by the State Bar of Arizona Board of Legal Specialization may say that they are "certified specialists."