• US Legal Forms

Use Of Deception In Research In Chicago

State:
Multi-State
City:
Chicago
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The form outlines a legal complaint for a case involving the use of deception in selling a life insurance policy in Chicago. It details the plaintiff's claims of fraud and misrepresentation against the defendants, including allegations of misleading premium structures and undisclosed information about policy performance. Key features of the form include provisions for outlining the parties involved, the nature of the complaint, and the damages sought by the plaintiff. Filling and editing instructions emphasize clarity, requiring the user to provide specific factual details pertinent to their case. This form is suitable for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants looking to file a complaint regarding deceptive practices in the insurance industry. The structure supports a comprehensive presentation of facts and legal arguments, ensuring compliance with relevant legal standards. Specific use cases include cases of insurance fraud, disputes over policy representations, and claims for both actual and punitive damages. This form serves as a critical tool for users to effectively advocate for their rights in instances of deceptive practices related to insurance contracts.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

Deception should only be used when its use is the only way to answer the research question. Research plans that involve the use of deception must be adequately justified and, in most cases, will require that research participants be informed about the deception at the conclusion of their participation.

For studies involving deception, debriefing materials should explain the design and procedures used for deception, and the reason(s) why deception was necessary. After debriefing participants in studies that have involved deception, it may be necessary to re-consent participants.

The study must not involve more than minimal risk to the subjects. The use of deceptive methods must be justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value.

Active deception involves intentionally providing inaccurate or false information to participants (e.g., one study team member tells participants that they will be engaged in a cooperative task with other participants, but instead they will be interacting with other members of the study team).

(a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

Deception and incomplete disclosure are permissible in research with scientific value that would not be otherwise feasible without the use of deceptive procedures.

Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

The IRB discourages the use of deception when: Alternative methods can be used that will yield valid study results. The deception deprives participants of the opportunity to protect their own interests. The missing information affects the participants' ability to assess the risks of participation.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Use Of Deception In Research In Chicago