This is a multi-state form covering the subject matter of the title.
Product Defect Examples In Pennsylvania
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000283
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
To successfully sue for a defective product, you need to prove that: The defendant designed, manufactured, distributed or sold a defective product to the consumer. The consumer used reasonable care when using the product. The consumer was injured due to the defect in the product.
A toy box was defectively manufactured – the hinges were not installed properly on the lid. If a child is playing with the box and the lid closes too quickly because of the defective hinges, it can cause serious injuries to the child.
Your lawyer must establish a direct link between the breach of duty (defective product) and the injuries that you sustained. The attorney must show that the defect was a substantial factor in causing the harm, connecting the defendant's actions or omissions to the resulting injuries.
Statute of Limitations for Product Liability Claims In Pennsylvania, product liability claims must be filed within two years from the date the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. Missing this deadline may result in losing your right to pursue compensation.
Manufacturing Defects For example, a screw might not be tightened properly during assembly, causing it to come loose during the operation of the product. Other examples include poor quality control standards or lack of testing before the release of a product onto the market.
The Top 5 Common Warning Signs of a Defective Product There are unusual or unexpected malfunctions. Recalls or safety alerts have been released. There is an increased risk of injuries or illnesses. A lack of clear instructions or warnings exists on the labeling. Unexpected or severe adverse effects occur after use.
There are two main ways to prove a product liability case: 1- the Consumer-Expectation Test and 2- the Risk Utility Test. Under both tests, the plaintiff has the burden to prove that the product that caused injury was defective and unreasonably dangerous.
Your lawyer must establish a direct link between the breach of duty (defective product) and the injuries that you sustained. The attorney must show that the defect was a substantial factor in causing the harm, connecting the defendant's actions or omissions to the resulting injuries.
A toy box was defectively manufactured – the hinges were not installed properly on the lid. If a child is playing with the box and the lid closes too quickly because of the defective hinges, it can cause serious injuries to the child.