Arrest Without Probable Cause In Phoenix

State:
Multi-State
City:
Phoenix
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document serves as a complaint regarding an arrest without probable cause in Phoenix, detailing the wrongful actions of the defendant that led to the plaintiff's arrest. It outlines key features such as the basis of the claims, including malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Filling and editing instructions emphasize the need for accurate personal information, including the names of the plaintiff and defendant, dates, and specific charges. The plaintiff requests compensatory and punitive damages amounting to specified figures. This form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants handling similar cases, as it provides a structured format for filing complaints in wrongful arrest situations. Legal professionals will benefit from understanding the specific elements required to substantiate claims of wrongful arrest and the potential for damages. Paralegals and legal assistants can use this complaint template as a basis for drafting similar legal documents for clients who have suffered unjust criminal actions.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For False Arrest and Imprisonment - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For False Arrest and Imprisonment - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

The usual definition of the probable cause standard includes “a reasonable amount of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to justify a prudent and cautious person's belief that certain facts are probably true.” Notably, this definition does not require that the person making the recognition must ...

There are four categories into which evidence may fall in establishing probable cause. These include observational, circumstantial, expertise, and information: Observational evidence is based on what the officer sees, smells, or hears.

Among the options given, reasonable suspicion is not considered a legitimate source of probable cause. Reasonable suspicion involves a belief that a person may be involved in criminal activity based on specific and articulable facts.

For the belief that the law was being violated on the premises to be searched; and if the apparent facts set out in the affidavit are such that a reasonably discreet and prudent man would be led to believe that there was a commission of the offense charged, there is probable cause justifying the issuance of a warrant.

There are four categories into which evidence may fall in establishing probable cause. These include observational, circumstantial, expertise, and information: Observational evidence is based on what the officer sees, smells, or hears.

One instance where a lack of Probable Cause may arise is in prosecutions for Driving Under the Influence pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC and California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) VC. Law enforcement is always on heightened alert for impaired drivers, especially at certain times and locations.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ...

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Arrest Without Probable Cause In Phoenix