Brendlin v. California | United States Courts.
The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
To claim a violation of Fourth Amendment rights as the basis for suppressing relevant evidence, courts have long required that the claimant must prove that they were the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing.
In the United States, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, there may be circumstances when law enforcement officers conduct searches without obtaining a warrant, raising concerns about potential violations of individuals' civil liberties.
NC Protections Against Evidence Obtained During Warrantless Searches. In the United States, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The Fourth Amendment has two basic clauses. One focuses on the reasonableness of a search and seizure; the other, on warrants.
Brendlin v. California | United States Courts.