This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.
This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.
An original petition for mandamus against a superior court judge will be considered by the Supreme Court only when a stand-alone petition for mandamus was first filed in the same superior court to be decided by another judge and that procedure proved ineffective.
The centuries-old remedy is increasingly used to force hotly contested political issues before state courts. Mandamus is an old common law remedy that allows a court to order government officials to perform their public duties.
Order Denying Writ of Administrative Mandamus is a Final, Appealable Judgment. The Court of Appeal held that a ruling denying a petition for writ of mandate constitutes the final judgment in the case and triggers the 60-day period for filing an appeal. Meinhardt v. City of Sunnyvale, 76 Cal.
In Georgia, a habeas petition challenges the legality of an inmate's confinement after a direct appeal has failed. A petition may also be used to overturn an invalid sentence, or address a denial of bond. Only people who have been restrained in their liberty may file a habeas petition.
In Anglo-American legal systems, mandamus (Latin for “we command”) is used by courts of superior jurisdiction to compel the performance of a specific act refused by a lower court, such as the hearing of a case falling within the latter's authority.
It enforces the due performance of an official duty, ensuring that legal rights are not trampled by inaction. In Georgia, the specific legal remedy of mandamus is not granted lightly; it is reserved for situations where no other proper remedy exists.
If there is a failure by the responding party to furnish their responses, the opposing party will first attempt to solve the outstanding discovery dispute. Normally, the attempt takes the form of a 6.4(b) letter asking the opposing party to furnish their responses by a given date.
(a) state or imply that the lawyer is disinterested; when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the unrepresented person misunderstands the lawyer's role in the matter, the lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to correct the misunderstanding; and (b) give advice other than the advice to secure counsel, if a ...
No second or subsequent motion for reconsideration by the same party after a first motion has been denied shall be filed except by permission of the Court.
When a due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, an official state or federal holiday, or a day when the Clerk's Office has been closed per an order posted on the Court's website, the time for filing is extended to the next business day. This rule applies to all filings, including motions for reconsideration.