This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.
Petition Writ Form With Two Points In Cook
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Cook
Control #:
US-000277
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
A Petition for Writ of Certiorari is an appellee's formal request to a state Supreme Court or to the Supreme Court of the United States to review a case for error or violation that occurred in a lower court.
That there is a “reasonable probability” that four Justices will grant certiorari, or agree to review the merits of the case; 2. that there is a “fair prospect” that a majority of the Court will conclude upon review that the decision below on the merits was erroneous; 3.
For example, in a petition for writ of certiorari, a common statement here would be to have a section heading called “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” and then a short paragraph stating “petitioner XYZ requests that this court issue a writ of certiorari to reverse and remand the decisions below.” This is not a place ...
The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review.
State every ground (reason) that supports your claim that you are being held in violation of the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. Attach additional pages if you have more than four grounds. State the facts supporting each ground. Any legal arguments must be submitted in a separate memorandum.
If at least four of the nine justices vote in favor of accepting it, the court will hear the case. If the justices decline to hear a case, only they know why. They never comment on why they have declined a petition.
When it was discovered that the judgment was not final, the writ of certiorari was dismissed as improvidently granted.
This type of petition usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law, and that the mistake should be fixed to prevent confusion in similar cases.
One example where the Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari and heard a case was entitled Filarsky v. Delia. In this case, the Supreme Court had to determine whether qualified immunity extends to a lawyer who is working for the government but is not a government employee.
The Court granted Gideon's petition for a writ of certiorari – that is, agreed to hear Gideon's case and review the decision of the lower court – in order to determine whether Betts should be reconsidered.