These legal elements include a professional duty owed to a patient, breach of duty, proximate cause or causal con- nection elicited by a breach of duty, and resulting in- juries or damages suffered. 1 These 4 elements apply to all cases of negligence regardless of specialty or clin- ician level.
Strict liability is liability without regard to defective conduct. Defec- tive conduct may be present, but its presence is not essential to liability. When liability in tort is strict, the basis of liability is not that the defendant's conduct was defective.
(1) No fault liability means liability of a person even without any negligent act on his part and even if he has taken due care and caution. (2) If a person brings and keeps any dangerous thing on his land, then he is liable for any damage caused if the thing escapes.
An important consequence of the fact that negligence necessarily involves wrong in the doing, but not in the doer, is that in some of its applications liability for negligence may be strict in the sense that it is imposed on defendants who should not be blamed for failing to have exercised reasonable care.
Negligence Torts This usually involves car accidents, slip and fall accidents, or medical malpractice. To succeed in a negligence claim, you must prove duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Intentional torts – An intentional tort is one in which the defendant knew or should have known that their action would cause injury. For example, if someone physically attacks another person, the injured person would have a tort claim against the attacker.
In order to establish negligence, you must be able to prove four “elements”: a duty, a breach of that duty, causation and damages.
From this perspective, to make a claim in tort a claimant must show that they have (or had) a right, exercisable against the defendant, that has been infringed. However, the claimant's right is not a right exercisable against the defendant as it is not a property right (which is exercisable against the world).