The law regarding a motion attacking sentence of a federal court is set forth in 28 USC § 2255.
(a) A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
(b) Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the United States attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. If the court finds that the judgment was rendered without jurisdiction, or that the sentence imposed was not authorized by law or otherwise open to collateral attack, or that there has been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the prisoner as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack, the court shall vacate and set the judgment aside and shall discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant a new trial or correct the sentence as may appear appropriate.
(c) A court may entertain and determine such motion without requiring the production of the prisoner at the hearing.
(d) An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals from the order entered on the motion as from a final judgment on application for a writ of habeas corpus.
(e) An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section, shall not be entertained if it appears that the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the court which sentenced him, or that such court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.
(f) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. The limitation period shall run from the latest of
(1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final;
(2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such governmental action;
(3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or
(4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.
(g) Except as provided in section 408 of the Controlled Substances Act, in all proceedings brought under this section, and any subsequent proceedings on review, the court may appoint counsel, except as provided by a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority. Appointment of counsel under this section shall be governed by section 3006A of title 18.
(h) A second or successive motion must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals to contain
(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or
(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.
Lima Arizona Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is a legal process available to individuals who have been convicted and sentenced in federal court in the Pima County, Arizona area. This motion provides an opportunity for a person in federal custody to challenge their sentence and seek relief based on certain grounds or legal errors made during their trial or sentencing. There are several types of Lima Arizona Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, including: 1. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: This motion argues that the person's defense attorney provided ineffective representation during their trial, resulting in a violation of their constitutional rights. These violations may include a failure to investigate or call relevant witnesses, provide adequate legal advice, or present a strong defense strategy. 2. Constitutional Violations: This type of motion alleges that the person's constitutional rights were violated during the trial or sentencing process. It may include claims of improper search and seizure, coerced confessions, violation of the right to confront witnesses, or any other violation of the person's rights protected by the United States Constitution. 3. New Evidence: If there is new evidence that was not available during the trial, a person in federal custody can file a motion to vacate their sentence. This evidence must be substantial and must demonstrate that it would likely have changed the outcome of the trial or sentencing. 4. Sentencing Errors: This motion challenges errors made by the court during the sentencing phase. It can argue that the court misapplied the sentencing guidelines, relied on incorrect information, imposed an unreasonable or excessive sentence, or failed to consider mitigating factors. 5. Change in Law: If there has been a significant change in the law since the person's sentencing, they may be able to file a motion to vacate their sentence based on this change. This may include changes in statutory law, case law, or sentencing guidelines that would have resulted in a different outcome if applied at the time of sentencing. It is important to note that filing a Lima Arizona Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody requires a thorough understanding of federal rules and procedures. It is highly recommended seeking the assistance of a qualified attorney who specializes in federal criminal defense to navigate through this complex process effectively.
