Recommend Signatory Peer Review Report For Free

I am/We are grateful to the reviewers for their insightful comments on my paper. I/We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the reviewers. I/We have highlighted the changes within the manuscript. Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments and concerns.

Here are some key points to remember when providing reasons for your reviewer selection: if the reason for choosing the reviewer is not obvious, authors must provide a valid reason, such as the said reviewer teaches classes on that specific topic, works on a similar area, has supervised or co-supervised master or PhD ...

Journals earn money from subscriptions, article processing charges, etc. However, they do not pay anything to the peer reviewers. Researchers are sometimes paid for reviewing books or other written work. However, they are usually not paid for reviewing scientific papers.

Peer review has many unseen costs directly related to publication of articles, even though there are usually no monetary transactions involved in the process.

Criteria for success A successful peer review: Contains a brief summary of the entire manuscript. Show the editors and authors what you think the main claims of the paper are, and your assessment of its impact on the field. What did the authors try to show and what did they try to claim?

Five core elements of peer review are identified. Constitutive elements of scholarly peer review include: fairness in critical analysis of manuscripts; the selection of appropriate reviewers with relevant expertise; identifiable, publicly accountable reviewers; timely reviews, and helpful critical commentary.

The golden rules The identity of the reviewers must be kept confidential unless open peer review is used. Reviewers advise and make recommendations; editors make the decisions. Reviewers must assess manuscripts objectively and review the work, not the authors. Editors-in-chief must have full editorial independence.

Peer review follows a number of steps, beginning with submitting your article to a journal. Step 1: Editor assessment. ... Step 2: First round of peer review. ... Step 3: Revise and resubmit. ... Step 4: Accepted.