Title: Understanding Wisconsin Motion for Refusal and Change of Venue Due to Co-Defendant's Prior Criminal Convictions Keywords: Wisconsin, motion, refusal, change of venue, co-defendant, prior criminal convictions Introduction: In Wisconsin criminal proceedings, a motion for refusal and change of venue can be filed when a co-defendant has prior criminal convictions. This motion aims to address concerns related to impartiality and the potential for prejudice against the accused. Types of Wisconsin Motion for Refusal and Change of Venue Due to Co-Defendant's Prior Criminal Convictions: 1. Motion for Refusal: The motion for refusal requests the removal of a judge from the case due to potential bias or prejudice toward the defendant based on the co-defendant's prior criminal convictions. It highlights the need for a fair and unbiased judgment to ensure a just trial. 2. Motion for Change of Venue: A motion for change of venue requests the transfer of the trial to a different location, usually outside the jurisdiction where the alleged offense occurred. This motion is filed to mitigate the influence and perception of the co-defendant's criminal history on potential jurors, ensuring a neutral jury pool. Detailed Description: 1. Motion for Refusal: When a co-defendant's prior criminal convictions may unfairly affect the court's objectivity or create a hostile environment for the defendant, filing a motion for refusal is crucial. This motion can be filed by the defendant's attorney and requires a detailed explanation of the reasons for refusal. The following points are typically included: a) Identification of the co-defendant: Clearly identify the co-defendant who possesses prior criminal convictions that have the potential to taint the proceedings. b) Articulating the basis for refusal: Present a compelling argument outlining how the co-defendant's criminal history creates a reasonable doubt regarding the judge's impartiality or the fairness of the trial. This may involve highlighting specific connections, prejudices, or biases that could unfairly influence the judge's decision-making process. c) Supporting evidence: Include any factual evidence, such as documented instances of bias or prejudiced remarks made by the judge. Cite relevant legal precedents and rules supporting the motion. 2. Motion for Change of Venue: A motion for change of venue seeks to relocate the trial to a different jurisdiction to ensure a fair trial, free from any influence caused by the co-defendant's prior criminal convictions. This motion must be supported by a convincing argument and relevant evidence, including: a) Pretrial publicity: Establish that pretrial publicity surrounding the co-defendant's criminal history has garnered significant attention, potentially jeopardizing the jury's ability to remain impartial in the current jurisdiction. b) Demonstrating community prejudice: Highlight instances of community bias or prejudices related to the co-defendant's prior criminal convictions that may impact the jury's objectivity. This could involve presenting surveys, media coverage, or expert witness testimonials. c) Proposed alternative venues: Suggest alternative locations where the trial can be conducted, emphasizing their suitability for providing an impartial and fair trial. Conclusion: In Wisconsin, a motion for refusal and change of venue due to a co-defendant's prior criminal convictions can be instrumental for defendants seeking a fair and unbiased trial. By presenting a compelling argument supported by evidence, defendants can increase their chances of obtaining a just outcome. However, it is essential to consult with an experienced attorney to navigate the complexities of filing such motions effectively.