Tennessee Jury Instruction — 2.2.4.2: Pretrial Detainee Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need Description: Tennessee Jury Instruction 2.2.4.2 focuses on cases where a pretrial detainee alleges deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. This instruction is crucial in determining the responsibility of jail or prison officials in providing appropriate medical care to detainees awaiting trial. When a detainee's health is at risk, deliberate indifference means that the authorities are aware of the detainee's condition but fail to take reasonable steps to address it. Keywords: 1. Tennessee Jury Instruction — 2.2.4.2 2. Pretrial detainee 3. Deliberate indifference 4. Serious medical need 5. Jail officials 6. Prison officials 7. Medical care 8. Detainee's health 9. Reasonable steps 10. Awareness Different Types of Tennessee Jury Instruction — 2.2.4.2 Pretrial Detainee Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need: 1. Indications of Serious Medical Need: — This type of instruction deals with identifying what constitutes a "serious medical need" for a pretrial detainee. It explains the medical conditions that warrant immediate attention and care, ensuring that the jury understands the severity of the claim. 2. Elements of Deliberate Indifference: — Here, the instruction outlines the elements required to prove deliberate indifference. It includes illustrating that the authorities were aware of the detainee's medical needs, the potential risks involved, and their failure to address the situation appropriately. 3. Standard of Care for Jail/Prison Officials: — This type of instruction focuses on determining the standard of care expected from jail and prison officials when it comes to providing medical attention. It explains the responsibilities and obligations these officials have towards the detainees' well-being while awaiting trial. 4. Causation and Damages: — This instruction delves into the connection between the deliberate indifference of jail/prison officials and the harm suffered by the pretrial detainee. It helps the jury assess the extent of damages caused due to the lack of medical care and the accountability of the responsible parties. 5. Qualified Immunity: — This instruction addresses the defense of qualified immunity, which may arise when defendants claim that they acted reasonably within their official capacity. The instruction clarifies the conditions necessary for qualified immunity to apply and how it may affect the outcome of the case. These different types of Tennessee Jury Instruction — 2.2.4.2 are designed to provide comprehensive guidance to the jury in understanding and evaluating cases involving pretrial detainees alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.