Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is an important legal concept used in civil cases in Ohio. This instruction is given to the jury to help them understand and apply the principle of comparative negligence when determining liability and awarding damages in a personal injury or negligence case. Comparative negligence is a defense strategy used by defendants to mitigate their liability by arguing that the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the injuries or damages they suffered. Under Ohio law, this defense allows the jury to assign a percentage of fault to both the plaintiff and the defendant, and the damages awarded to the plaintiff are then reduced by their percentage of negligence. The purpose of Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 is to inform the jury about the elements and application of comparative negligence. It guides the jurors on how to consider and evaluate the evidence presented during the trial to determine the degree of negligence of each party involved. The instruction explains that if the jury finds that both the plaintiff and the defendant were negligent, they must assign a percentage of fault to each party. The jury must consider the nature and extent of the negligence, as well as the actions or omissions that contributed to the incident in question. There are no specific types or variations of Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense, as it primarily serves as a general guideline for the jury's consideration. However, it is worth noting that Ohio follows a modified comparative negligence rule with a 51% bar. This means that the plaintiff can only recover damages if their percentage of negligence is 50% or less. If the plaintiff's negligence is found to be 51% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages. In conclusion, Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is an essential component of civil cases in Ohio. It provides guidance to the jury on how to apportion fault between the plaintiff and the defendant based on their respective negligence. Understanding this instruction is crucial for jurors to make fair and just decisions when determining liability and awarding damages in personal injury or negligence cases.