Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care is an important legal instruction that is often utilized in personal injury cases in the state of Nevada. This instruction emphasizes the duty of the injured party to take reasonable steps to mitigate or minimize their damages by pursuing proper and necessary medical care. When a person sustains an injury due to the negligence or wrongful act of another party, Nevada law requires the injured party to act reasonably in seeking medical treatment. Failing to do so may limit their ability to recover compensation for their damages. Keywords: Nevada Jury Instruction, Duty to Mitigate, Pursuing Medical Care, Personal Injury, Negligence, Wrongful Act, Damages, Compensation. Different Types of Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care: 1. Duty to Mitigate Damages: This type of instruction emphasizes the injured party's obligation to actively seek and follow medical treatment that is necessary to alleviate their injuries. It highlights that failure to do so could result in reduced compensation from the responsible party. 2. Reasonable Steps to Mitigate Damages: This instruction guides the jury to consider whether the injured party took reasonable actions to mitigate their damages by promptly seeking medical care, adhering to treatment plans, following medical advice, and not exacerbating their injuries through their own contributory negligence. 3. Limits on Recovery: This variation of the instruction outlines that if the injured party does not fulfill their duty to mitigate, their recovery may be limited to only those damages that would have been reasonably incurred if they had pursued appropriate medical treatment. 4. Reasonable Timeframe for Seeking Medical Care: This instruction explains that an injured party should seek medical care within a reasonable timeframe after the incident. It guides the jury to assess whether the injured party acted promptly in pursuing treatment, taking into account any valid reasons or circumstances that may have caused delays. 5. Consequences of Failure to Mitigate Damages: This instruction informs the jury about the potential consequences of the injured party's failure to mitigate their damages. It clarifies that even if the defendant's actions were negligent or wrongful, the injured party must still take reasonable steps to minimize their injuries and subsequent losses. 6. Legal Factors for Determining Mitigation: This type of instruction explains the legal factors to consider when evaluating whether the injured party reasonably mitigated their damages through pursuing medical care. It may include factors such as the availability of medical facilities, financial constraints, the severity of the injuries, and any other relevant circumstances. These various instructions help guide the jury in understanding the duty of the injured party to mitigate their damages through pursuing necessary and reasonable medical care. By adhering to this duty, injured individuals can increase their chances of receiving fair compensation for their injuries and losses.