A Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (NOV), also known as a Motion for Directed Verdict or Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, is a legal request made by a party in a trial to challenge the jury's verdict after the trial has concluded. In the alternative, a Motion for a New Trial can be filed if the party believes there were errors or misconduct during the trial that resulted in an unjust verdict. In Michigan, there are different types of Motions for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or for a New Trial, which are as follows: 1. Michigan Motion for NOV: This motion is filed by the party who disagrees with the jury's verdict and believes that no reasonable jury could have made such a decision based on the evidence presented at trial. 2. Michigan Motion for Directed Verdict: This motion is typically made during trial and seeks a judgment in favor of one party before the case is sent to the jury. If granted, it results in a verdict without the need for the jury's decision. 3. Michigan Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law: This motion is similar to a Motion for Directed Verdict and can be made either during trial or after the jury's verdict. It asserts that there is insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the opposing party. 4. Michigan Motion for a New Trial: This motion is an alternative to a NOV and can be filed when a party believes that errors or misconduct have occurred during the trial process, resulting in an unjust verdict. Common grounds for a new trial include jury misconduct, newly discovered evidence, or errors in the application of law during the trial. It is important to note that the standards and procedures for these motions may vary in different jurisdictions. Therefore, it is crucial to consult the specific rules and guidelines set forth by the Michigan court system when preparing and filing such motions.