Maine Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial — Prejudicial Statements at Trial In legal proceedings in Maine, parties have the option to file a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial based on prejudicial statements made during the trial. Such statements can significantly impact the fairness and integrity of the proceedings, warranting the need for appropriate remedies. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict seeks to challenge the jury's decision based on the contention that no reasonable person could have reached the verdict reached. This type of motion focuses on the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial and questions whether the verdict was supported by the law and the facts. However, if the party believes that prejudicial statements made during the trial influenced the jury's decision, an alternative option is to file a motion for a new trial. This motion seeks to set aside the verdict and start the trial afresh. Here, the party alleges that the prejudicial statements created an unfair and biased environment, compromising the impartiality of the jury and potentially influencing their judgment. It is important to note that Maine recognizes various categories or grounds for a motion for a new trial based on prejudicial statements at trial. These can include: 1. Improper statements by opposing counsel: If opposing counsel makes statements that are not based on evidence or improperly characterizes the facts of the case, it may create prejudice against the moving party. 2. Witness testimony: If a witness, intentionally or unintentionally, makes prejudicial statements during their testimony, it could influence the jury's perception of the case and potentially affect the outcome. 3. Jury misconduct: If it is discovered that one or more jurors engaged in misconduct, such as discussing the case outside the courtroom or conducting independent research, it can be grounds for a new trial due to prejudice. 4. Judicial misconduct: If the judge demonstrates bias or makes improper comments during the trial that could prejudice the jury, it can be a basis for a motion for a new trial. 5. Improper introduction of evidence: If evidence is admitted that should have been excluded due to its prejudicial nature, it may create an unfair advantage for one party and undermine the integrity of the trial. When filing a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial based on prejudicial statements at trial, it is crucial to provide specific details and evidence to support the claim of prejudice. This includes citing the specific statements or actions that are alleged to be prejudicial, explaining their impact on the trial, and demonstrating how they compromised the fairness of the proceedings. Ultimately, the purpose of these motions is to ensure that parties receive a fair trial free from prejudicial influences. By addressing the issue of prejudicial statements, the court aims to uphold the principles of justice and protect the rights of all parties involved.