In Maryland, a Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is a legal tool used during trial proceedings to exclude certain evidence related to actions taken by a defendant to fix or mitigate a dangerous condition or prevent future harm. This motion seeks to prevent the introduction of evidence that a defendant has made changes after an accident or incident that could influence the jury's perception of negligence or liability. The primary purpose of this motion is to ensure that the jury's decision is based solely on the facts and events that occurred at the time of the incident, rather than being swayed by the subsequent actions taken by the defendant to rectify the situation. By preventing the admission of evidence regarding remedial measures, the court aims to promote fairness and avoid potential prejudice against the defendant. There are a few types of Maryland Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures that can be filed, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. These include: 1. General Motion in Liming: This motion seeks a broad exclusion of all evidence related to any remedial actions or measures taken by the defendant after the incident occurred. It aims to ensure that the jury focuses solely on the events leading up to the incident and disregards any subsequent changes made by the defendant. 2. Specific Motion in Liming: In some cases, a more focused approach may be required to exclude evidence regarding only certain specific remedial measures. This type of motion is filed when the defendant has taken multiple remedial actions, but not all of them are relevant or might unduly influence the jury's perception of liability. 3. Motion in Liming to Limit Testimony: This motion is used to restrict witnesses from discussing any remedial measures taken by the defendant. It effectively prevents witnesses from introducing evidence of changes made after the incident, thereby limiting the jury's exposure to such information. 4. Motion in Liming to Exclude Exhibits: Occasionally, the defendant may have physical exhibits or documents that demonstrate remedial measures they have taken. This motion is aimed at preventing the admission of such exhibits into evidence, ensuring they do not influence the jury's decision-making process. By utilizing these various types of motions in liming, defense attorneys in Maryland can strategically prevent evidence of remedial measures from being presented to the jury, protecting their clients from potential prejudice and ensuring a fair trial based solely on the facts and events that occurred at the time of the incident.