You may spend hours on-line trying to find the legal document design that meets the state and federal requirements you need. US Legal Forms supplies 1000s of legal types which can be reviewed by experts. You can easily acquire or print the Maryland Complaint regarding Misappropriation by Former Employee and Prospective Purchaser from your service.
If you have a US Legal Forms account, you can log in and click the Download switch. Afterward, you can total, change, print, or indicator the Maryland Complaint regarding Misappropriation by Former Employee and Prospective Purchaser. Each legal document design you buy is your own permanently. To have an additional version of the purchased kind, proceed to the My Forms tab and click the corresponding switch.
If you work with the US Legal Forms internet site initially, adhere to the straightforward directions beneath:
Download and print 1000s of document web templates making use of the US Legal Forms website, which offers the biggest collection of legal types. Use skilled and condition-specific web templates to deal with your organization or personal requires.
Texas courts differ on whether to apply the doctrine. A number of Texas courts have expressly rejected the ?inevitable disclosure? doctrine as an improper means of imposing non-compete-like obligations where only confidentiality obligations truly exist.
The inevitable disclosure doctrine allows a plaintiff to ?prove a claim of trade secret misappropriation by demonstrating that defendant's new employment will inevitably lead him to rely on the plaintiff's trade secrets.? PepsiCo, Inc. v. Redmond, 54 F. 3d 1262, 1269 (7th Cir. 1995).
It concluded that five states appear to have rejected the doctrine: California, Colorado, Louisiana, Maryland and Virginia. The other 28 states have not yet taken a position on the doctrine.
The doctrine proposes that an employee ?may be enjoined by demonstrating that the employee's new job duties will inevitably cause the employee to rely upon knowledge of the former employer's trade secrets.?
Delaware courts do recognize the inevitable disclosure doctrine. ?A court may limit a defendant from working in a particular field if his doing so poses a substantial risk of the inevitable disclosure of trade secrets.? W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Wu, 2006 WL 2692584, at *17 (Del.