You might spend hours online attempting to locate the legal document template that satisfies the state and federal standards you require.
US Legal Forms provides thousands of legal forms that can be examined by professionals.
You can conveniently obtain or print the Maryland Complaint regarding Misappropriation by Former Employee and Prospective Purchaser from your platform.
If available, use the Review button to browse through the document template as well. If you wish to find another version of the form, use the Search field to locate the template that fits your needs and requirements. Once you have found the template you want, click Buy now to continue. Choose the pricing plan you desire, enter your information, and register for an account on US Legal Forms. Complete the transaction. You may utilize your credit card or PayPal account to purchase the legal form. Select the format of the document and download it to your device. Make changes to your document if necessary. You can complete, modify, sign, and print the Maryland Complaint regarding Misappropriation by Former Employee and Prospective Purchaser. Download and print thousands of document templates using the US Legal Forms website, which offers the largest collection of legal forms. Utilize professional and state-specific templates to address your business or personal needs.
Texas courts differ on whether to apply the doctrine. A number of Texas courts have expressly rejected the ?inevitable disclosure? doctrine as an improper means of imposing non-compete-like obligations where only confidentiality obligations truly exist.
The inevitable disclosure doctrine allows a plaintiff to ?prove a claim of trade secret misappropriation by demonstrating that defendant's new employment will inevitably lead him to rely on the plaintiff's trade secrets.? PepsiCo, Inc. v. Redmond, 54 F. 3d 1262, 1269 (7th Cir. 1995).
It concluded that five states appear to have rejected the doctrine: California, Colorado, Louisiana, Maryland and Virginia. The other 28 states have not yet taken a position on the doctrine.
The doctrine proposes that an employee ?may be enjoined by demonstrating that the employee's new job duties will inevitably cause the employee to rely upon knowledge of the former employer's trade secrets.?
Delaware courts do recognize the inevitable disclosure doctrine. ?A court may limit a defendant from working in a particular field if his doing so poses a substantial risk of the inevitable disclosure of trade secrets.? W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Wu, 2006 WL 2692584, at *17 (Del.