In a jury trial jury instructions are given to the jury at the end of the case. These instructions are prepared by the attorneys of both parties and presented to the judge for approval. The instructions tell the jurors what the law is and how to apply the law to the facts that have been proven.
Title: Idaho Instruction to Jury — Essential Factual Elements Necessary to Hold an Instructor, Trainer, or Coach Liable for an Injury to a Participant in a Sports Activity Introduction: In Idaho, it is important to understand the essential factual elements required to hold an instructor, trainer, or coach liable for any injuries sustained by a participant during a sports activity. This instruction to the jury serves as a comprehensive guide outlining the necessary criteria to determine liability in such cases. We will explore the different types of scenarios where an instructor, trainer, or coach can be held responsible for an injury to a participant. 1. Negligence Standard: The jury must assess whether the instructor, trainer, or coach failed to meet the standard of care expected of a reasonable professional in their field. To establish liability, the following factual elements need to be considered: a. Duty of Care: The injured participant must provide evidence that the instructor, trainer, or coach owed them a duty of care to ensure their safety during the sports activity. b. Breach of Duty: It must be proven that the instructor, trainer, or coach breached the duty of care. This could involve actions or omissions that fall below the expected standard, such as inadequate supervision, improper training techniques, or failure to warn of known risks. c. Causation: The participant needs to demonstrate that the instructor, trainer, or coach's breach of duty was the direct cause of the injury. This may involve showing a clear link between the negligent conduct and the specific harm suffered. d. Damages: The participant must provide evidence of actual harm or injuries resulting from the breach of duty. This may include medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, or any other damages suffered. 2. Limited Governmental Immunity: Idaho law grants limited immunity to governmental entities and their employees, including instructors, trainers, or coaches, engaged in sports activities. However, immunity may be waived if the injury resulted from a reckless or intentional act or omission. 3. Assumption of Risk: Idaho recognizes the legal doctrine of assumption of risk, which can limit or bar recovery for an injured participant. The jury should consider whether the participant was aware of and voluntarily assumed the inherent risks associated with the sports activity. Conclusion: In instances where an instructor, trainer, or coach is alleged to be liable for an injury to a participant in a sports activity, the essential factual elements outlined above must be examined by the jury. Considering duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages, the jury will decide whether the defendant should be held responsible. Understanding the proper application of these elements is crucial in ensuring an accurate determination of liability in Idaho sports activity-related injury cases.
