This is simply a short statement that states that, in the event of a conflict between the provisions of one Article and the terms and conditions contained in prior Articles provided for in the Agreement, the parties agree that the provisions of a designated Article shall prevail.
Hawaii Conflict of Terms is a legal concept that pertains to resolving conflicts between different terms or provisions in a contract or legal document in the state of Hawaii. It refers to situations where there is ambiguity, inconsistency, or contradiction between various terms used within the document, leading to potential confusion or dispute. Keywords: Hawaii, Conflict of Terms, legal concept, resolving conflicts, contract, legal document, ambiguity, inconsistency, contradiction, confusion, dispute. There are different types of Hawaii Conflict of Terms that may arise in legal agreements, including: 1. Contradictory Terms: This type of conflict occurs when two or more terms in a contract directly contradict each other, creating ambiguity or confusion. For example, one term may state that payment is due within 30 days, while another term specifies a payment deadline of 45 days. 2. Inconsistent Terms: Inconsistencies arise when different sections or provisions of a contract use different language or terminology to describe the same obligation or condition. These inconsistencies can lead to discrepancies and misunderstandings. For instance, one section may refer to "rent" while another section refers to "lease payment" to denote the same financial obligation. 3. Ambiguous Terms: Ambiguities occur when certain terms or phrases in a contract are unclear, allowing for multiple interpretations. Lack of clarity in contractual language can give rise to disagreements between the parties involved. An example could be the use of a term like "reasonable time" without defining what it means in specific terms. 4. Prioritization of Terms: This type of conflict occurs when there is a hierarchy or order of precedence among different terms within a contract. Sometimes, a contract may explicitly state which term takes precedence over others in case of inconsistency or conflicts. For example, a contract may specify that any addendum or amendment supersedes the original terms of the agreement. 5. Extrinsic Evidence: In certain instances, external evidence or extrinsic factors may come into play to resolve conflicts of terms. This involves looking beyond the words of the contract to interpret the true intention or understanding of the parties involved. Extrinsic evidence can include emails, letters, or oral agreements that may shed light on the disputed terms. In Hawaii, resolving conflicts of terms typically involves careful analysis and interpretation of the entire contract, often with the assistance of legal professionals. The objective is to determine the true intention of the parties and ensure the contract is enforced fairly and equitably. By identifying and addressing conflicts of terms, parties can avoid potential disputes and establish clearer guidelines for their agreements.
