The International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property was first signed in Paris in 1883. The document itself is known as the Paris Convention. The convention has been revised many times and its current language encompasses patents, trademarks, and industrial designs. As of November 2008, there were 173 contracting parties to the Paris Convention.
The Paris Convention established some important international protocols to deal with multi-national patent filings. It both protects some rights of those who file international applications, and governs procedure for how signatory states should treat these patent filings. Most importantly, the Paris Convention included the vital concept of “priority". This means that under the Paris Convention, patent applicants are granted the date of their first filing as the active application date for patent applications in all additional Paris Union countries, for up to 12 months after filing the original application.
Another useful function of the Paris Convention treaty is that it contains provisions to ensure that intellectual property holders who are non-residents and non-nationals of a Paris Union country are given the same expectations and rights under the law as nationals of said country.The District of Columbia Assignment of Pending Application by Sole Inventor — Paris Convention refers to a legal process that grants an inventor the ability to transfer ownership rights of a pending patent application to another party in the District of Columbia. This assignment is made in accordance with the provisions stated in the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. Under the Paris Convention, which is an international agreement, inventors are provided with the option to assign their patent application to another entity before the patent is granted. By doing so, the assignee gains the right to obtain the patent once it is approved. This assignment is particularly useful when inventors want to transfer their rights or financial interests to another individual or organization. The District of Columbia recognizes and applies the principles set forth in the Paris Convention, allowing inventors to make such assignments. This process requires precise documentation and compliance with legal requirements to ensure a smooth and valid transfer of ownership. Different types of District of Columbia Assignment of Pending Application by Sole Inventor — Paris Convention may include: 1. Full Assignment: This type of assignment involves the complete transfer of rights from the sole inventor to another party. The assignee gains full control over the pending patent application, including the right to make decisions, enforce the patent, and collect royalties. 2. Partial Assignment: In certain cases, the inventor may choose to assign only a portion of their rights to the pending patent application. This can be done to share the financial obligations or responsibilities associated with obtaining the patent. 3. Exclusive Assignment: An exclusive assignment means that the inventor transfers all rights to a single assignee, making them the sole owner of the pending patent application. This type of assignment typically involves a contractual agreement that restricts the inventor from transferring their rights to any other party. 4. Non-Exclusive Assignment: Unlike an exclusive assignment, a non-exclusive assignment permits the inventor to assign their rights to multiple parties simultaneously. This type of assignment is common when the inventor wishes to license their invention to several entities or individuals. It is essential to engage the services of a qualified attorney or legal professional experienced in intellectual property law to ensure that the District of Columbia Assignment of Pending Application by Sole Inventor — Paris Convention is properly executed. This will help protect the rights and interests of both the inventor and assignee throughout the transfer process.
