False imprisonment is defined as consisting of unlawful restraint against the will of an individual's personal liberty or freedom of locomotion. Unlawful detention is the basis of false imprisonment. It is also defined as any intentional detention of the person of another unauthorized by law.
False imprisonment is confining or physically restraining a person, such as by being locked in a car, being tied to a chair or locked in a closet, with no legal authority to hold the person. It is similar to a charge of kidnapping and it usually occurs in conjunction with a false arrest. False imprisonment is often a crime and if proved is almost always the basis of a lawsuit for damages.
Any intentional detention of the person of another not authorized by law is false imprisonment. It is any illegal imprisonment, without due process or under a false authority, without consideration of whether any crime has been committed or a debt due.
In Arizona, a Complaint for Unreasonable Detention and Search of Customer on Accusation of Shoplifting or Stealing against a Store and Store Manager is a legal document filed by an individual who believes they were wrongfully detained and searched based on accusations of shoplifting or stealing. This complaint seeks to hold the store and store manager accountable for their actions, seeking compensation for any damages or distress caused. Keywords: Arizona Complaint, Unreasonable Detention, Search, Customer, Accusation, Shoplifting, Stealing, Store, Store Manager, Wrongful, Detained, Searched, Compensation, Damages, Distress. Types of Arizona Complaints for Unreasonable Detention and Search of Customer on Accusation of Shoplifting or Stealing against Store and Store Manager: 1. Complaint for Unreasonable Detention: This type of complaint focuses on the unjustified detention of a customer by the store and store manager. It may include details about the duration and circumstances of the detention, as well as any harm suffered as a result. 2. Complaint for Unlawful Search: This type of complaint centers around an improper or invasive search conducted by the store and store manager based on an accusation of shoplifting or stealing. It highlights the violation of the customer's privacy rights and the possible damages incurred. 3. Complaint for Defamation: In some cases, customers may also file a complaint for defamation if they believe that false accusations of shoplifting or stealing were made against them by the store and store manager. This complaint aims to address any harm caused to the individual's reputation due to these false claims. 4. Complaint for Negligence: If the store and store manager acted negligently during the detention and search process, resulting in physical or emotional harm to the customer, a complaint for negligence can be filed. This type of complaint seeks compensation for any injuries or distress caused by the store's negligence. 5. Complaint for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: If during the detention and search, the store and store manager intentionally caused severe emotional distress to the customer, a complaint for intentional infliction of emotional distress can be pursued. This complaint aims to address the psychological harm inflicted on the individual. Overall, these different types of Arizona Complaints against a store and store manager in cases of unreasonable detention and search provide customers with legal avenues to seek justice, hold responsible parties accountable, and recover damages or compensation for any harm suffered.
