The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required. In other words, the statement publicized about the plaintiff must be false in order to prove defamation.
In Utah, person claiming defamation must prove that: The information was false and unprivileged. In publishing the statements, the defendant acted with the “requisite degree of fault.” When applied to a private individual, this requires simple negligence, while a public figure must prove actual malice.
Truth is the best defense to defamation. For example if sued for calling a person a criminal, then the defendant could produce a valid record of a criminal conviction, properly certified and exemplified and the defendant would probably be granted summary judgement.
Definition: defamation from 28 USC § 4101(1) | LII / Legal Information Institute.
Utah Code Section 76-9-404.
An effective defamation cease and desist letter will usually begin with a clear and factual introduction of the involved parties. Following this, the letter should present the facts in a chronological order, beginning with the earliest incident and progressing through subsequent events.
In Utah, person claiming defamation must prove that: The information was false and unprivileged. In publishing the statements, the defendant acted with the “requisite degree of fault.” When applied to a private individual, this requires simple negligence, while a public figure must prove actual malice.
To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence ; and 4) damages , or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the ...
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
To establish a case of defamation, the claimant must prove that the statement was false, published to others, and resulted in harm or damages. Moreover, if the claimant is a public figure, they must also show that the statement was made with actual malice.