A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Defamation Through Social Media Without Consent In Wake
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Wake
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Knowingly publishing a lie about another person would be libel if that lie damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject. If the damaging lie was spoken rather than written, then it would be slander.
Social media defamation can take various forms, including: Text Posts: False statements made in posts or comments. Images and Videos: Defamatory content can be conveyed through manipulated images or videos. Reviews and Ratings: False negative reviews on platforms like Google, Yelp, or Facebook.
In many cases, the harassment remains verbal. However, as long as the victim faces disruption to their ability to work safely, any action could fall under the category of harassment. Needless to say, rumors and slander attack the reputation of an individual and can make it difficult or even impossible to work safely.
Signs, gestures, photographs, pictures can also give rise to a claim in defamation. The difference between claims for libel and claims for slander is what a claimant must prove to succeed.
The best way for you to avoid any legal trouble for photoshopping an image is to get consent from the photographer. Note that you need to get the consent of the photographer, not the person depicted in the photo. This is because under copyright law, the creator of the work owns the copyright.
If you're being defamed online, you can consider taking legal action against the defamer. Consult with an attorney to explore your options, which may include sending cease-and-desist letters, pursuing a defamation lawsuit, or seeking removal of the defamatory content through online platforms or hosting providers.
Although the photographer does own the copyright for the photographs, they cannot use the photographs publicly without your permission if the photographs have been commissioned for private or domestic purposes (such as a family photo shoot or a wedding.)
If another business uses it without your permission, that is copyright infringement. On the other hand, if a third party or agency photographs you, you may not own the copyright in the image. However, this does not mean that you do not have any rights.
The Act abolishes the distinction between libel and slander and the action for defamation may be brought without proof of special damage. There are three traditional elements to the cause of action that the plaintiff must establish, namely publication, identification and defamatory meaning.
