Libel Vs Slander Without Consent In Massachusetts
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required.
Massachusetts laws 260, § 4 Statute of limitations. Actions for slander or libel "shall be commenced only within three years next after the cause of action accrues."
Truth is widely accepted as a complete defense to all defamation claims. An absolute privilege is also a complete defense to a defamation claim. Among other examples, this includes statements made by witnesses during a judicial proceedings.
Under Massachusetts law, a plaintiff alleging libel must ordinarily establish five elements: (1) that the defendant published a written statement; (2) of and concerning the plaintiff; that was both (3) defamatory and (4) false; and (5) either caused economic loss, or is actionable without proof of economic loss.
Slander can be hard to prove, as the complainant must show the slanderer was driven by malice and knew their claims were false. Slander is different from libel, which are false statements made through print or broadcast.
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required. In other words, the statement publicized about the plaintiff must be false in order to prove defamation.
If you are a private person, you only have to prove libel, but not malicious intent. Consequently, it's easier for private citizens to win a libel case than it is for a public figure to win a libel case.
Massachusetts laws MGL c. 260, § 4 Statute of limitations. Actions for slander or libel "shall be commenced only within three years next after the cause of action accrues."
Massachusetts on Defamation: “A plaintiff alleging libel must ordinarily establish five elements: (1) that the defendant published a written statement; (2) of and concerning the plaintiff; that was both (3) defamatory, and (4) false; and (5) either caused economic loss, or is actionable without proof of economic loss.”
