A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Defamation Without Mentioning Name In Kings
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Kings
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The Aspects of a Professional Apology Acknowledging the mistake. Expressing regret and taking responsibility. Proposing solutions and corrective actions. Asking for forgiveness and closing. Nonverbal communication and body language. Apologies in emails. Apologizing in person. Remote apology.
An apology should be well-timed. An apology that is published soon after the initial libel will in almost all cases be better at reducing damage. The time of day of a publication may matter. Ideally, an apology should reach the same audience as the original libel.
Be Genuine An apology that does not accompany a retraction may appear disingenuous. Offering to make an apology is not the same as making one. A private and confidential apology will do little to reduce reputational harm. Likewise, an apology should not further defame.
What Are The 5 Elements Of Defamation? Publication Of Information Is Required. The Person Being Defamed Was Identified By The Statement. The Remarks Had A Negative Impact On The Person's Reputation. The Published Information Is Demonstrably False. The Defendant Is At Fault.
The plaintiff must be able to prove all three elements discussed above – that the material has been communicated to a third person (other than the plaintiff), that the plaintiff is identified in the communication and that the communication defames him/her.
Defamation that causes long-term damage, particularly if it affects your career, social standing, or personal life, will result in higher damages than something short-term that might be forgotten within a year. The more severe and lasting the harm, the greater the compensation.
These include: There must be a defamatory statement. The defamatory statement must be understood by right-thinking or reasonable minded persons as referring to the plaintiff. There must be a publication of the defamatory statement, that is to say, it must be communicated to some person other than the plaintiff himself.
A person who wishes to take legal action for defamation must be able to prove that they have suffered, or could suffer, 'serious harm'. If a corporation is suing for defamation, it needs to prove that it has suffered 'serious financial loss' as a result of the publication of the allegedly defamatory matter.
