Non-binding arbitration can be valuable for less complex business-to-business and business-to-consumer disputes where the parties may be too far apart in their viewpoints to mediate or are in need of an evaluation of their respective positions.
Ing to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the most common types of disputes that are settled by arbitration are as follows: Breach of fiduciary duty; Failure to supervise; Negligence; Misrepresentation; Breach of contract; Suitability; Omission of facts; Fraud; and.
Arbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way to resolve disputes than time-consuming and expensive litigation.
If your case involves factors like privacy concerns, the need for a quicker resolution, or the desire to avoid a public jury trial, arbitration might be an ideal solution. However, if you're worried about the finality of the arbitrator's decision or the potential for bias, you might prefer the traditional court route.
This means that any disputes between customers and banks over account fees, identity theft, or other charges will be decided by an arbitrator that the bank helps choose, rather than an impartial judge.
Non-binding arbitration can be valuable for less complex business-to-business and business-to-consumer disputes where the parties may be too far apart in their viewpoints to mediate or are in need of an evaluation of their respective positions.