Under Texas law noncompete agreements can be enforceable if: The noncompete provision is part of an otherwise enforceable agreement. The non-compete requirement is supported by valid consideration (consideration meaning something of value provided to the employee).
The following are a couple of examples of reasons that an employee in Texas may be able to get out of a non-compete agreement: The employer failed to sign the agreement; The employer failed to abide by other technical requirements of the Texas Covenants Not to Compete Act; or.
Does a Non-Compete Agreement Apply in a Lay-off or Termination? In Texas, there is no requirement that the employee must leave on their own terms to preserve the enforceability of the non-compete agreement. In other words, a non-compete agreement remains in force whether the employee quit, was fired, or laid off.
Short answer: Generally if a non-compete is valid under the law it is enforceable if you are fired (as long as you are not fired for a wrong reason under the law). Validity of non-competes was often litigated.
On August 20, 2024, a Texas federal court ruled that the FTC's final rule banning most non-compete agreements (the “Non-Compete Rule”) cannot go into effect as scheduled.
To be valid under Texas law, a covenant not to compete must be “ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement.” Then, the restrictions must be reasonable in scope. The “otherwise enforceable agreement” requirement simply means that both parties to the contract must have made binding promises.
In other words, a non-compete agreement remains in force whether the employee quit, was fired, or laid off. However, the reason for termination can be a factor when seeking to enforce a non-compete.
In Texas, a court has the ability to modify – or even nullify – the non-compete if the court determines that it is not reasonable. The courts are given wide latitude to reform a non-compete if the court believes the scope of activity, duration, or geographic area are too restrictive.
A federal judge in Texas has blocked a new rule from the Federal Trade Commission that would have made it easier for employees to quit a job and work for a competitor.