Federal Arbitration Act Grounds For Vacating Award In Pima
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
India Code: Section Details. (1) The arbitral proceedings shall be terminated by the final arbitral award or by an order of the arbitral tribunal under sub-section (2). (c) the arbitral tribunal finds that the continuation of the proceedings has for any other reason become unnecessary or impossible.
Section 35 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides that subject to Part-I of the Act an arbitral award shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them respectively.
—When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.
To vacate an award, the arbitrators must have known of a governing legal principle yet refused to apply it or ignored it, and the law ignored by the arbitrators must be clearly defined.
(1) Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside such award in ance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3). (ii) the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India. (iii) it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.
34A Appeals against awards (2) An appeal under this section may be brought by any of the parties to an arbitration agreement. (d) that, despite the agreement of the parties to resolve the matter by arbitration, it is just and proper in all the circumstances for the Court to determine the question.
(1) Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside such award in ance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3). (ii) the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India. (iii) it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.
A court may vacate an award only if it finds that one of the limited grounds in the FAA (9 USC section 10) applies, namely: the award is a result of corruption or fraud; there was evident partiality or corruption by an arbitrator; there was arbitrator misconduct; or.
The statutory grounds for vacating an arbitration award under Section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act and state counterparts are limited to matters such as arbitrator corruption, fraud, evident partiality, misconduct and exceeding of powers. These grounds do not go to the merits of the award.
The merits of the dispute are not considered and the award can only be vacated where: (1) the award was procured by fraud or corruption; (2) there was corruption in the arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator committed misconduct resulting in substantial prejudice; (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers; (5) the arbitrator ...