Arbitration Case Statement With Multiple Conditions In Oakland
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
There are some cases when both mediation and arbitration are necessary to reach a solution. This is called med-arb.
The most common combination of mediation and arbitration is med-arb, in which the parties attempt to resolve their dispute using mediation and proceed to arbitration only if they are not successful in reaching a settlement. Commentators praise this combination as offering the parties flexibility and efficiency.
Unlike mediation, the arbitration process is binding, which means that the parties are legally obligated to accept and comply with the arbitration decision/award rendered by the arbitrators. Without question, mediation should almost always be the first step in working towards resolving a dispute.
There are typically seven stages of the arbitration process: Claimant Files a Claim. Respondent Submits Answer. Parties Select Arbitrators. Parties Attend Initial Prehearing Conference. Parties Exchange Discovery. Parties Attend Hearings. Arbitrators Deliberate and Render Award.
Although it is more expensive and formal than mediation, arbitration is still typically cheaper than in-court litigation and can save a lot of time. Arbitration does typically require an attorney, as it is the most similar to a lawsuit of all the alternatives to dispute resolution.
The arbitrator will decide the case within 10 days of the hearing. The arbitrator will send a copy of the award to the parties and the original to the Arbitration Administrator with a proof of service attached. If the case is very complicated, the Court may give the arbitrator 20 days more to decide your case.
Ing to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), both arbitration and mediation involve a neutral third party who oversees the process and tries to help participants find common ground during a dispute.
When the arbitrator makes a decision, this is called an award and it's legally binding. If you don't agree with the decision, you can't take your case to court to get the decision changed.
Village of Harriman, a New York appellate court stated that “an arbitrator is not bound by principles of substantive law or rules of evidence, and may do justice and apply his or her own sense of law and equity to the facts as he or she finds them to be.”14 Without the right to appeal an arbi- tration award that does ...
If your case involves factors like privacy concerns, the need for a quicker resolution, or the desire to avoid a public jury trial, arbitration might be an ideal solution. However, if you're worried about the finality of the arbitrator's decision or the potential for bias, you might prefer the traditional court route.