Motion For Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction In Maricopa
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Injunctions may preserve and safeguard assets or evidence, or may restrain people from committing certain acts. Mandatory orders require the other party to perform certain acts such as returning property.
TROs: A TRO can be requested if immediate harm or danger is shown. Preliminary Injunctions: These are used in serious cases where the harm to the plaintiff is significant and immediate, and the other party is not greatly affected.
After a motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed, the court will often hold a hearing to determine whether to issue it. The preliminary injunction hearing can serve as a “mini-trial” on the merits of the plaintiff's case, albeit on an expedited basis with limited evidence.
In most cases, you must have evidence to convince the judge that the person seeking a restraining order is in danger of harm. The danger or harm can include domestic violence, threats, criminal trespass, stalking, and harassment. An adult can file for a restraining order when they believe their safety is in danger.
A temporary restraining order (TRO) is a short-term pre-trial temporary injunction. To obtain a TRO, a party must convince the judge that they will suffer immediate irreparable injury unless the order is issued.
To cover those situations in which notice cannot be reasonably given, Rule 65 provides for temporary restraining orders (or TROs), A temporary restraining order is like a preliminary injunction but, if it is issued without notice to the adverse party, its duration is limited to ten days.
Taking a medical malpractice lawsuit as an example, if a patient believes that their doctor has provided negligent medical care that has caused them harm, the patient may seek a preliminary injunction to prevent the doctor from continuing to provide care.
(1) The judicial officer must issue an Injunction Against Harassment upon finding: (A) reasonable evidence that the defendant has committed harassment as defined in Rule 3(c), against the plaintiff, and that the defendant committed the most recent act of harassment against the plaintiff during the year preceding the ...
