In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Interference With Attorney Client Relationship In Sacramento
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Sacramento
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
4 A lawyer may be disciplined under Business and Professions Code section 6106 for acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption, whether intentional, reckless, or grossly negligent.
Conflicts of Interest – a lawyer may not be representing a client to the best of their ability due to allegiance to another client, or the opposition. Fraudulent Activity – forged documents, doctored evidence, or dishonorable witnesses. Lawyer Fees – improper billing for services rendered.
One of the most frequent ethical dilemmas in legal practice is the conflict of interest. This occurs when a lawyer's duty to one client is compromised by their duty to another client, a third party, or their own interests.
Common reasons clients file a complaint against their attorney: Your lawyer doesn't respond to your attempts at contact and refuses to return telephone calls and emails. You're told a settlement check was sent to your attorney, but your lawyer never informs you of it.
(a) A lawyer employed or retained by an organization shall conform his or her representation to the concept that the client is the organization itself, acting through its duly authorized directors, officers, employees, members, shareholders, or other constituents overseeing the particular engagement.
Things that are immoral (for many) but are not illegal. Cheating on your spouse. Breaking a promise to a friend. Using abortion as a birth control measure. People can not be arrested or punished with imprisonment or fines for doing these things.
Proposed rule 4.2 carries forward the substance of current rule 2-100, the “no contact” rule, and prohibits a lawyer who represents a client in a matter from communicating, either directly or indirectly, about the subject matter of the representation with a person represented by a lawyer in the same matter.
Proposed rule 4.4 requires a lawyer who receives a writing relating to the representation of the lawyer's client and knows or reasonably should know that the writing is either privileged or subject to the work product doctrine, when it is reasonably apparent to the receiving lawyer that the writing was inadvertently ...
Rule 3.7 Lawyer as Witness If the lawyer represents the People or a governmental entity, the consent shall be obtained from the head of the office or a designee of the head of the office by which the lawyer is employed.