In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Attorney Client Privilege With Former Employees In Ohio
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Section 2907.231 | Engaging in prostitution. (B) No person shall recklessly induce, entice, or procure another to engage in sexual activity for hire in exchange for the person giving anything of value to the other person.
(A) No person shall operate a motor vehicle, trackless trolley, streetcar, agricultural tractor, or agricultural tractor that is towing, pulling, or otherwise drawing a unit of farm machinery on any street, highway, or property open to the public for vehicular traffic without being in reasonable control of the vehicle, ...
Under Ohio law, a privilege log must at least "state that communications were made between attorney and client for the purpose of procuring legal advice or representation." Cargotec, Inc. v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 155 Ohio App.
Section 1701.95 | Liability for unlawful loans, dividends, distribution of assets.
This situation would breach Rule 1.9, which prohibits a lawyer from representing a client in a matter substantially related to one in which they had previously represented another client. In this case, the attorney would possess confidential information from the prior representation that could harm the current client.
Ohio Revised Code § 2317.02 states that an attorney may not testify concerning communications made to the attorney by the client, except under specific circumstances. The statute covers mostly testimonial disclosures and anything not covered by the statute is governed by the common-law privilege.
Rule 8.3 requires a lawyer to report "unprivileged knowledge of a violation of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a question as to any lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects." Thus, there are two triggers to a lawyer's reporting duty under Rule 8.3.