In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Attorney Suing Client For Fees In Maricopa
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Maricopa
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving ...
12-341.01 - Recovery of attorney fees. A. In any contested action arising out of a contract, express or implied, the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney fees.
Is an attorney more powerful than a lawyer? Not necessarily. While attorneys specifically represent clients in court, both lawyers and attorneys have the same level of legal education and training. The distinction is more about their role, rather than their power or authority.
The simplest and fastest form of legal action you can take is to file a claim in small claims court. Your case should be straightforward: You'll claim that the other side breached your written agreement by not paying you, and you want the judge to award judgment to you for the entire amount owed.
Deciding whether to sue a client for unpaid fees and expenses requires a careful and in-depth analysis of the risks and benefits of bringing such a claim. Attorneys should be wary of the risk of a malpractice counterclaim, as well as the financial risks associated with a collection suit.
In the U.S., each party in a legal case typically pays for their own attorney fees, under a principle known as the American rule.