This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Amendment Of Us V Lopez In Tarrant
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Tarrant
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The best summary of the decision in United States v. Lopez (1995) is that Congress cannot use the commerce clause to regulate the possession of firearms in public schools.
United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
Related Cases Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964). Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964). Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183 (1968). League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 183 (1968). Garcia v. Gregory v.
In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local school zones.
United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) Gun possession is not an economic activity that has any impact on interstate commerce, whether direct or indirect, so the federal government cannot base a law prohibiting gun possession near schools on the Commerce Clause.
US v. Lopez was a landmark case as ruled that the federal government had exceeded its authority under the commerce clause.
Lopez argues that section 922(q) exceeds Congress' delegated powers and violates the Tenth Amendment. The government counters that section 922(q) is a permissible exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.
5–4 decision The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.
More info
In a 5-4 decision supporting Lopez, the Supreme Court found that the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act did violate the Constitution. Lopez was charged in a one-count indictment with violating 18 USC § 922(q), which makes it illegal to possess a firearm in a school zone.The supreme court sided with lopez in a 5-4 decision and here's the reasoning from the majority opinion. After the Lopez decision, the GFSZA was amended to specifically only apply to guns that had been moved via interstate or foreign commerce. The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 made the knowing possession of a firearm in a school zone a crime under federal law. The issue in this case is whether the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to enact a statute that makes it a crime to possess a gun in, or near, a school. The Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that Lopez was correct. The Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that Lopez was correct. Jump to essay-9See, e.g. (b) The secret making of the wire recording of the conversation did not violate petitioner's rights under the Fourth Amendment.